Baseball Toaster The Juice Blog
Help
Societal Critic at Large: Scott Long
Frozen Toast
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
The Juice
Archives

2009
02  01 

2008
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2004
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2003
12  11  10  09 
E-mail

scott@scottlongonline.com

Personally On the Juice
Scott Takes On Society
Comedy 101
Kick Out the Jams (Music Pieces)
Even Baseball Stories Here
Link to Scott's NSFW Sports Site
Gammons Homage Notes
2008-05-14 11:21
by Will Carroll

* PitchFX is changing things so fundamentally that I'm not sure we have any comprehension just how much. Was color TV considered a gimmick when it first came in?

* I've finally cracked the video thing. No, my big egg-shaped head isn't different, but the problem isn't me ... well, it is, but you know what I mean. The problem is that most people surf at work, meaning video is both a bandwidth and an attention problem. What's needed is closed-captioning -- the video could run, but you could read along. Of course, if all you get is a talking head that's muted and reading along, that's not compelling. I need to figure out how to get more stuff -- diagrams, anatomical drawings -- into the act. Ideally, I could show the injury happen itself, but that's still a rights issue. So, if you want to start a business, vlog captioning is my idea. If it's already out there, let me know.

* A Ken Griffey Jr deal back to the Mariners will probably end up being the last deal of the Bavasi Era in Seattle. I have a piece that's been in limbo regarding the "Top Ten GM Candidates" that I need to finish.

* If Ben Gibbard (Death Cab for Cutie) and Colin Meloy (The Decemberists) sang together, would the world end? I think it would just be very depressing, if brilliant.

* American Idol has jumped the shark. If they were smart -- and they are -- they'd take about five years off and let the talent "build" out there. An interim step would be some kind of "celebrity" AI. Take a group of already signed, but neglected talent jump in. Add in some people looking for respect or a second chance - I'm thinking Ashlee Simpson here - and you have something interesting. Even a seeming "ringer" like Mariah Carey or Christina Aguilera might have trouble with the wrong theme.

* Jay Bruce is leading the International League in nearly every hitting category of note and Dusty Baker is inserting Corey Patterson as his leadoff man. I don't have anything past that. "We hold these truths to be self-evident."

* More fun with Minor League stats:
*Mike Hessman has 17 HR. SEVENTEEN!
*Brian Mazone has four wins for a team that doesn't have ten wins.
*How is Luke Hughes not better right now than Nick Punto?
*Bobby Brownlie is making something of a comeback in the Nats organization and was just bumped up to Triple-A. *Mat Gamel and Matt LaPorta both have OPS over 1000 in Double-A, but will have to convince the baseball world that defense really doesn't matter. With Ryan Braun in LF and one of these two in RF, I'm not sure having Dwayne Murphy would help. The Brewers would have to have nothing but K/GB pitchers to make it work. Hmm.
*Ever root for a guy just because of his name? I'd love to hear several announcers deal with Chris Jakubauskus. Heck, I'd like to hear the Raniers great Mike Curto do it.
*Same thing with Kila Kaaihue.
*It used to be you could tell when someone really knew prospects by whether they knew how to pronounce "Nageotte" (Nazh-ette). Then it was "Komine" (Ko-min-ay). Who is it now?

* Is there a better site out there now than Ballbug? No, there is not. Even better, it's the epitome of "Bissinger's Dilemma" - content is content and good blogs are right there aside good newspapers or "pro" web sites like BP and MLB.com. The next step will be disintermediation of comments, which will be a big deal because of ad revenue. After that, I think there's going to be a much bigger disintermediation, but I'll wait until I've figured out the profit angle on that before talking about it.

Comments
2008-05-14 12:03:48
1.   jgpyke
The idea of vlog captioning is old. Google it.
2008-05-14 12:08:02
2.   Linkmeister
"I'd love to hear several announcers deal with Chris Jakubauskus."

One of the more amusing aspects of the breakup of the Soviet Union was the sudden influx of Eastern Bloc players onto the pro tennis circuit and the resultant struggles of sportscasters to pronounce names they'd never run across before.

2008-05-14 12:39:44
3.   rbj
Yeah, love for Mike Hessman (I'm currently living in Toledo) The Mudhens already have 60 homeruns.
2008-05-14 13:15:34
4.   misterjohnny
We really don't want any anatomical drawings in your video bits.

Oh, you meant of injuries. never mind.

2008-05-14 13:48:54
5.   dianagramr
Cominu up next on the video segment .... Jenn Sterger shows off her curve(s).
2008-05-14 13:52:23
6.   Ken Arneson
If video doesn't work unless you can read along, it suggests that text is still clearly the superior technology.

Text is more easily scanned, searched, re-viewed, and accessed privately. If video is going to pull off a Clayton Christensen-style revolution, it won't be by providing the exact same thing that text/photos do, only worse. It'll be by starting off doing something that it's not worth the effort for text to go.

Perhaps part of your struggles with the medium may come from the fact that what video does best vs. text is convey emotions. But emotional arguments are antithetical to the Baseball Prospectus worldview, which makes it even harder for you to exploit the medium.

2008-05-14 15:02:55
7.   Will Carroll
jgpyke ... the "vlog captioning" issue isn't new, but the solution doesn't appear to be out there. Heck, this blog post comes in the top ten hits! I'm asking if there's a solution. Never doubted I was far from the first to think about it.

Ken ... text isn't superior, text is ingrained, entrenched. My struggles with the medium are physical (big round head) and rights-based (can't show the video because I don't have billions of dollars.) I can SHOW you how Drew got injured so much more easily than I can describe it.

2008-05-14 17:07:33
8.   jgpyke
Will: I realized that's what you meant after I had posted. (FWIW, it's not what you wrote, which is what I responded to. I am not being pedantic: I just took you literally the first time around...the antecedent to "it" was "idea"...blahblahblah...sorry.)
2008-05-14 17:55:16
9.   Ken Arneson
7 I strongly disagree, Will. You could look like Brad Pitt, and text would still be superior.

If I'm a fantasy player, for example, I probably don't really care how Drew got hurt. He's not on my fantasy team. All I want to do is scan your column for MY players and see how long they're gonna be out. Text is far superior for that purpose than video. I'm only interested in 5% of your content. If your content is on video instead of text, I have to subject myself to 95% of the content I don't care about in order to get to the 5% I do want.

Showing how Drew got hurt is a great use of video. But I shouldn't have to hear about how Furcal's back is doing and when ARod's going to return in the same video. Video will succeed when it is used in a way that makes the consumer more effective and efficient, not the producer.

2008-05-14 18:29:17
10.   Shaun P
9 So what we need is tabs/bookmarks in video, so that you can easily jump to only those portions of the video that are of interest to you. Ken, then you can get the 30 seconds on how Harden is doing, and skip the 2 minute segment on Drew's knee, which Josh Wilker will want to watch, and you can both skip the 20 seconds about Posada's shoulder, which I'm interested in, and so on.
2008-05-14 19:39:48
11.   Ken Arneson
10 Well, yeah, sure. Certainly, a way to scan/search/link to video segments would help video compete with text. You can accomplish the same thing with current technology by simply breaking up the videos into the smallest necessary chunks, and embedding it into the text in the appropriate places.

It's how the video is used that matters. Render unto video that which must be video, but leave as text anything that works well as text.

I don't need to see Will's head reading something. Will can't read out loud faster than I can read text in my own head. He's not helping me use my time more efficiently by doing that. He's slowing me down.

Complement the text with video that can only be presented as video to get the message across.

2008-05-14 23:02:22
12.   The Mootz
The world would end if Ben and Colin sang with Morrissey.
2008-05-15 07:18:41
13.   chris in illinois
In what way has AI 'jumped the shark'?? The talent is as good as it has been during any other season...I've seen them all and I can barely remember who's won previously.

I won't argue that it could use some changes, but they wouldn't necessarily improve anything.

2008-05-15 15:07:32
14.   Will Carroll
Chris in IL: It's boring. Tell me 90% of America didn't see this final coming. The entire season has been predictable from Paula being goofy to Randy pumping out "dawg" and "pitchy." Survivor got lucky this season that it had twists and turns in ways it never has before, because it was on the edge.
2008-05-16 06:06:39
15.   williamnyy23
7 I agree with 9 . For reports like yours, text is still the best delivery method. Video might be a nice complement (launched via links, for example), but it would be less optimal as the main mode of delivery. I also agree with 11 that video of you speaking what otherwise would be written is a worse format than simple text. The only thing I'd want to see if what words can't deliver (i.e., highlights from actual games), and even then, that would be minimal.

Finally, closed captioning would be an awful idea, and jamming the screen with filler wouldn't be much better. Sometimes, there's no need to reinvent the wheel.

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.